Jump to content

Terminal and nonterminal symbols

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Terminal symbol)
The string "the dog ate the bone" was created using production rules that replaced nonterminal with terminal symbols.[1]

In formal languages, terminal and nonterminal symbols are two disjoint sets of lexical elements for specifying the production rules of a formal grammar. Terminal symbols are symbols that cannot be replaced by other symbols. Nonterminal symbols (or syntactic variables) are symbols that can be replaced by groups of terminal symbols according to the production rules.

We can define or generate a formal language from a formal grammar by serving the set of terminal symbols as its alphabet.

Terminal symbols

[edit]

Terminal symbols may appear in the outputs of the production rules of a formal grammar. The process of applying the production rules recursively to a start symbol might not terminate, but if it terminates when there is no more production rule can be applied, the output string will consist only of terminal symbols.

For example, consider a grammar defined by two rules. In this grammar, the symbol Б is a terminal symbol and Ψ is both a nonterminal symbol and the start symbol. The production rules for creating strings are as follows:

  1. The symbol Ψ can become БΨ
  2. The symbol Ψ can become Б

Here Б is a terminal symbol because no rule exists which would change it into something else. On the other hand, Ψ has two rules that can change it, thus it is nonterminal. Diagram 1 illustrates a string that can be produced with this grammar.

Diagram 1. The string Б Б Б Б was formed by the grammar defined by the given production rules. This grammar can create strings with any number of the symbol Б

Nonterminal symbols

[edit]

Nonterminal symbols are those symbols that can be replaced. They may also be called simply syntactic variables. A formal grammar includes a start symbol, a designated member of the set of nonterminals from which a set of terminal strings may be derived by successive applications of the production rules. The generated set is a formal language over the set of terminal symbols.

Context-free grammars are those grammars in which the left-hand side of each production rule consists of only a single nonterminal symbol. This restriction is non-trivial; not all languages can be generated by context-free grammars. Those that can are called context-free languages. These are exactly the languages that can be recognized by a non-deterministic push down automaton. Context-free languages are the theoretical basis for the syntax of most programming languages.

Production rules

[edit]

A grammar is defined by production rules (or just 'productions') that specify which symbols may replace which other symbols; these rules may be used to generate strings, or to parse them. Each such rule has a head, or left-hand side, which consists of the string that may be replaced, and a body, or right-hand side, which consists of a string that may replace it. Rules are often written in the form headbody; e.g., the rule ab specifies that a can be replaced by b.

In the classic formalization of generative grammars first proposed by Noam Chomsky in the 1950s,[2][3] a grammar G consists of the following components:

  • A finite set N of nonterminal symbols.
  • A finite set Σ of terminal symbols that is disjoint from N.
  • A finite set P of production rules, each rule of the form
where is the Kleene star operator and denotes set union, so represents zero or more symbols, and N means one nonterminal symbol. That is, each production rule maps from one string of symbols to another, where the first string contains at least one nonterminal symbol. In the case that the body consists solely of the empty string[note 1], it may be denoted with a special notation (often Λ, e or ε) in order to avoid confusion.
  • A distinguished symbol that is the start symbol.

A grammar is formally defined as the ordered quadruple . Such a formal grammar is often called a rewriting system or a phrase structure grammar in the literature.[4][5]

Example

[edit]

Backus–Naur form is a notation for expressing certain grammars. For instance, the following production rules in Backus-Naur form are used to represent an integer (which may be signed):

<digit> ::= '0' | '1' | '2' | '3' | '4' | '5' | '6' | '7' | '8' | '9'
<integer> ::= ['-'] <digit> {<digit>}

In this example, the symbols (-,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) are terminal symbols and <digit> and <integer> are nonterminal symbols. [note 2]

Another example is:

In this example, the symbols a,b,c,d are terminal symbols and S,A are nonterminal symbols.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ It contains no symbols at all.
  2. ^ This example supports strings with leading zeroes like "0056" or "0000", as well as negative zero strings like "-0" and "-00000".


References

[edit]
  1. ^ Rosen, K. H. (2012). Discrete mathematics and its applications. McGraw-Hill. pages 847-851
  2. ^ Chomsky, Noam (1956). "Three Models for the Description of Language". IRE Transactions on Information Theory. 2 (3): 113–123. doi:10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813. S2CID 19519474.
  3. ^ Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
  4. ^ Ginsburg, Seymour (1975). Algebraic and automata theoretic properties of formal languages. North-Holland. pp. 8–9. ISBN 0-7204-2506-9.
  5. ^ Harrison, Michael A. (1978). Introduction to Formal Language Theory. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. pp. 13. ISBN 0-201-02955-3.